In Control, the Core i3-4330 is slightly slower than the Core i5-9600K and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $11 more expensive!
Core i3-4330
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
Core i5-9600K
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 249 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 6% cheaper – $159.00 vs $169.95
- Up to 6% cheaper
- Up to 7% better value in Control – $0.63 vs $0.68/FPS
- Up to 7% better value in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-4330 vs Core i5-9600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
247 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
99%
Price, $
$169.95
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
93%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i5-9600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i5-9600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4330 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
