In Rust, the Core i3-4330 is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $31 more expensive!
Core i3-4330
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core i5-9400
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 225 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 18% cheaper – $139.00 vs $169.95
- Up to 18% cheaper
- Up to 22% better value in Rust – $0.61 vs $0.78/FPS
- Up to 22% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4330 vs Core i5-9400: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
216 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
87%
Price, $
$169.95
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
78%
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
225 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
100%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i5-9400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i5-9400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4330 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400 Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
