In Atomfall, the Core i3-4330 is slightly slower than the Core i5-7600 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $94 more expensive!
Core i3-4330
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core i5-7600
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 207 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 55% cheaper – $76.23 vs $169.95
- Up to 55% cheaper
- Up to 57% better value in Atomfall – $0.36 vs $0.84/FPS
- Up to 57% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4330 vs Core i5-7600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
200 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
97%
Price, $
$169.95
44%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
43%
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
207 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.23
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i5-7600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i5-7600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4330 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7600 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
