In Rust, the Core i3-4330 is slightly slower than the Core i5-10400F and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $6 cheaper!
Core i3-4330
- Up to 3% cheaper – $169.95 vs $175.99
- Up to 3% cheaper
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 5% faster in Rust – 228 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 1% better value in Rust – $0.77 vs $0.78/FPS
- Up to 1% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4330 vs Core i5-10400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
217 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
84%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
99%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
228 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$175.99
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4330 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
