In Atomfall, the Core i3-4330 is slightly slower than the Core i5-10400 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $5 cheaper!
Core i3-4330
- Up to 3% cheaper – $169.95 vs $174.99
- Up to 3% cheaper
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core i5-10400
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 212 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 2% better value in Atomfall – $0.82 vs $0.84/FPS
- Up to 2% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4330 vs Core i5-10400: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
201 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
95%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
98%
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
212 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
100%
Price, $
$174.99
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i5-10400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i5-10400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4330 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
