In Atomfall, the Core i3-4170T is slightly faster than the Xeon E5520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4170T
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 197 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Mar 30, 2015 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5520
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170T vs Xeon E5520: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170T
Mar 30th, 2015
Average FPS
197 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170T vs Xeon E5520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170T vs Xeon E5520 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170T
Mar 30th, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170T Mar 30th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 30th, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
