In Control, the Core i3-4170T is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4170T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 3% faster in Control – 254 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Control
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 30, 2015
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170T vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170T
Mar 30th, 2015
Average FPS
247 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
97%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170T vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170T vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170T
Mar 30th, 2015
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170T Mar 30th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2015 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
