In No Man's Sky, the Core i3-4170T is slower than the Core i9-12900K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $170 cheaper!
Core i3-4170T
- Up to 57% cheaper – $129.94 vs $300.33
- Up to 57% cheaper
- Up to 48% better value in No Man's Sky – $0.69 vs $1.33/FPS
- Up to 48% better value in No Man's Sky
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 20% faster in No Man's Sky – 225 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in No Man's Sky
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Mar 30, 2015
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
No Man's Sky FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170T vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170T
Mar 30th, 2015
Average FPS
188 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
70%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
225 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
87 FPS
100%
Price, $
$300.33
43%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
52%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170T vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170T vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170T
Mar 30th, 2015
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170T Mar 30th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
