In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4170T is slightly faster than the Core i7-10700K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $251 cheaper!
Core i3-4170T
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 183 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 66% cheaper – $129.94 vs $380.99
- Up to 66% cheaper
- Up to 68% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.71 vs $2.22/FPS
- Up to 68% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Mar 30, 2015
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170T vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170T
Mar 30th, 2015
Average FPS
183 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
171 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
93%
Price, $
$380.99
34%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
32%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170T vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170T vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170T
Mar 30th, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170T Mar 30th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2015 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
