In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4170 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5630. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4170
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer – May 01, 2014 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 54 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5630
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 205 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Xeon E5630: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
181 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
88%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Xeon E5630 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Xeon E5630 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1366 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
