In Deathloop, the Core i3-4170 is same performance as the Xeon E5-2678 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4170
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 54 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2678 v3
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
75%
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2678 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | – |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
