In Rust, the Core i3-4170 is slightly faster than the Phenom II X6 1045T. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $39 more expensive!
Core i3-4170
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 217 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – May 01, 2014 vs Sep 01, 2010
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
Phenom II X6 1045T
- Up to 40% cheaper – $59.77 vs $98.95
- Up to 40% cheaper
- Up to 38% better value in Rust – $0.28 vs $0.45/FPS
- Up to 38% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Phenom II X6 1045T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
60%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
62%
Phenom II X6 1045T
Sep 1st, 2010
Average FPS
208 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
83%
Price, $
$59.77
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Phenom II X6 1045T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Phenom II X6 1045T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Phenom II X6 1045T
Sep 1st, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Phenom II X6 1045T Sep 1st, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Sep 1st, 2010 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM3 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR2), 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
