In Deathloop, the Core i3-4170 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 235. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $178 cheaper!
Core i3-4170
- Up to 64% cheaper – $98.95 vs $277.30
- Up to 64% cheaper
- Up to 61% better value in Deathloop – $0.45 vs $1.15/FPS
- Up to 61% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core Ultra 5 235
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop – 240 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Core Ultra 5 235: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
218 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
91%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 235
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$277.3
35%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
39%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core Ultra 5 235 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core Ultra 5 235 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 5 235
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 235 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $257.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
