In Atomfall, the Core i3-4170 is slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $340 cheaper!
Core i3-4170
- Up to 77% cheaper – $98.95 vs $438.99
- Up to 77% cheaper
- Up to 72% better value in Atomfall – $0.49 vs $1.77/FPS
- Up to 72% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
201 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
81%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$438.99
22%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
28%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
