In Deathloop, the Core i3-4170 is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $450 cheaper!
Core i3-4170
- Up to 82% cheaper – $98.95 vs $548.89
- Up to 82% cheaper
- Up to 80% better value in Deathloop – $0.45 vs $2.25/FPS
- Up to 80% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 243 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
218 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
90%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$548.89
18%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
20%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
