In Atomfall, the Core i3-4170 is slower than the Core i9-12900KS. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $257 cheaper!
Core i3-4170
- Up to 72% cheaper – $98.95 vs $355.99
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in Atomfall – $0.48 vs $1.47/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 54 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core i9-12900KS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 241 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer – Apr 05, 2022 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Core i9-12900KS: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
202 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
83%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900KS
Apr 5th, 2022
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$355.99
27%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
33%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i9-12900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i9-12900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i9-12900KS
Apr 5th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900KS Apr 5th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Apr 5th, 2022 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $739.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
