In Atomfall, the Core i3-4170 is slower than the Core i9-12900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $190 cheaper!
Core i3-4170
- Up to 66% cheaper – $98.95 vs $289.00
- Up to 66% cheaper
- Up to 59% better value in Atomfall – $0.49 vs $1.20/FPS
- Up to 59% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 239 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
201 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
84%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
239 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$289
34%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
41%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
