In Atomfall, the Core i3-4170 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $144 cheaper!
Core i3-4170
- Up to 59% cheaper – $98.95 vs $242.94
- Up to 59% cheaper
- Up to 56% better value in Atomfall – $0.49 vs $1.11/FPS
- Up to 56% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
Core i7-9700K
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Core i7-9700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
200 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
93%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$242.94
40%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
44%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i7-9700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i7-9700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $385.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
