In Atomfall, the Core i3-4170 is slightly slower than the Core i7-8700. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $52 cheaper!
Core i3-4170
- Up to 34% cheaper – $98.95 vs $150.87
- Up to 34% cheaper
- Up to 32% better value in Atomfall – $0.49 vs $0.72/FPS
- Up to 32% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core i7-8700
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 207 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Core i7-8700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
201 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
97%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
207 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
100%
Price, $
$150.87
65%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
68%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i7-8700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i7-8700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700 Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
