In Atomfall, the Core i3-4170 is slightly slower than the Core i7-6850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4170
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 54 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-6850K
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 207 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – May 31, 2016 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Core i7-6850K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
200 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
97%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i7-6850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i7-6850K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Core i7-6850K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6850K May 31st, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | May 31st, 2016 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $617.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
