In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4170 is slightly slower than the Core i7-3770K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $94 cheaper!
Core i3-4170
- Is 2 years and 1 day newer – May 01, 2014 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 2 years and 1 day newer
- Up to 49% cheaper – $98.95 vs $193.11
- Up to 49% cheaper
- Up to 47% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.54 vs $1.01/FPS
- Up to 47% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 30% less energy – 54 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 30% less energy
Core i7-3770K
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 191 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Core i7-3770K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
182 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
95%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
191 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
100%
Price, $
$193.11
51%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
53%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i7-3770K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i7-3770K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3770K Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Apr 29th, 2012 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $313.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1155 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
