In Deathloop, the Core i3-4170 is slightly slower than the Core i7-13700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4170
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-13700F
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop – 237 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Core i7-13700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
218 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
92%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i7-13700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i7-13700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
