In Atomfall, the Core i3-4170 is slightly slower than the Core i5-9500. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $37 cheaper!
Core i3-4170
- Up to 27% cheaper – $98.95 vs $135.53
- Up to 27% cheaper
- Up to 23% better value in Atomfall – $0.49 vs $0.64/FPS
- Up to 23% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core i5-9500
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Core i5-9500: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
200 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
95%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Core i5-9500
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$135.53
73%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
77%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i5-9500 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i5-9500 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i5-9500
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9500 Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
