In Atomfall, the Core i3-4170 is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $38 cheaper!
Core i3-4170
- Up to 28% cheaper – $98.95 vs $137.32
- Up to 28% cheaper
- Up to 25% better value in Atomfall – $0.49 vs $0.65/FPS
- Up to 25% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core i5-9400
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 209 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Core i5-9400: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
201 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
96%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$137.32
72%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
75%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i5-9400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i5-9400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400 Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
