In Atomfall, the Core i3-4170 is slightly slower than the Core i5-7600 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $24 more expensive!
Core i3-4170
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core i5-7600
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 207 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 24% cheaper – $75.05 vs $98.95
- Up to 24% cheaper
- Up to 27% better value in Atomfall – $0.36 vs $0.49/FPS
- Up to 27% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Core i5-7600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
201 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
97%
Price, $
$98.95
75%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
73%
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
207 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
100%
Price, $
$75.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i5-7600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i5-7600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7600 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
