In Atomfall, the Core i3-4170 is slightly slower than the Core i5-10600K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $85 cheaper!
Core i3-4170
- Up to 46% cheaper – $98.95 vs $183.99
- Up to 46% cheaper
- Up to 42% better value in Atomfall – $0.49 vs $0.85/FPS
- Up to 42% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i5-10600K
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 216 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Core i5-10600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
200 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
93%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
216 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$183.99
53%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
58%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i5-10600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i5-10600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10600K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
