In Control, the Core i3-4170 is same performance as the Core i5-10400F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $66 cheaper!
Core i3-4170
- Up to 40% cheaper – $98.95 vs $165.17
- Up to 40% cheaper
- Up to 39% better value in Control – $0.40 vs $0.66/FPS
- Up to 39% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-10400F
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Core i5-10400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
99%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$165.17
59%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
61%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
