In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4160T is slightly slower than the Xeon E5530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer – Jul 21, 2014 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5530
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 203 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Xeon E5530: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Xeon E5530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Xeon E5530 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5530
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5530 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $530.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
