In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-4160T is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2678 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 234 vs 229 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2678 v3
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Xeon E5-2678 v3: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2678 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
