In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4160T is slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 7700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 184 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 7 7700
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Jan 14, 2023 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Ryzen 7 7700: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 7700
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
169 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
92%
Price, $
$274.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.62/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Ryzen 7 7700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Ryzen 7 7700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 7700
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 7700 Jan 14th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM5 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
