In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4160T is slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 5700X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 185 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 5700X
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer – Apr 04, 2022 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Ryzen 7 5700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Ryzen 7 5700X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 5700X
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 5700X Apr 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $299.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM4 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
