In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4160T is slightly faster than the Ryzen 5 1400. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 186 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 1400
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Apr 11, 2017 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Ryzen 5 1400: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 1400
Apr 11th, 2017
Average FPS
183 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
99%
Price, $
$69.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Ryzen 5 1400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Ryzen 5 1400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 1400
Apr 11th, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 1400 Apr 11th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM4 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
