In Deathloop, the Core i3-4160T is slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 4100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 3 4100
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 220 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer – Apr 04, 2022 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Ryzen 3 4100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 3 4100
Apr 4th, 2022
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$67.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Ryzen 3 4100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Ryzen 3 4100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 3 4100
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 4100 Apr 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $99.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM4 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
