In Rust, the Core i3-4160T is slightly faster than the Opteron 3365. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Up to 2% faster in Rust – 213 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Rust
- Is 1 year and 23 days newer – Jul 21, 2014 vs Jun 27, 2013
- Is 1 year and 23 days newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Opteron 3365
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Opteron 3365: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Opteron 3365 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Opteron 3365 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Opteron 3365
Jun 27th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Opteron 3365 Jun 27th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 27th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM3+ |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
