In Atomfall, the Core i3-4160T is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core Ultra 7 265: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$348.52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core Ultra 7 265 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core Ultra 7 265 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
