In Stray, the Core i3-4160T is same performance as the Core i9-7920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 35 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-7920X
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer – Sep 10, 2017 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer
Stray FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i9-7920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
283 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
187 FPS
100%
Price, $
$395
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i9-7920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i9-7920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
18%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-7920X Sep 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $1,199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA2066 |
35W | Power Consumption | 140W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
