Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3375 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Core i3-4160T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 26% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-4160T - 418 vs 332 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 32 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
418
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$417.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $417.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160T | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |