In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-4160T is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 100% faster in Battlefield 6 – 130 vs 65 FPS
- Up to 100% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
130 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
