In Manor Lords, the Core i3-4160T is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i7-9700K
- Up to 13% faster in Manor Lords – 195 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Manor Lords
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
Manor Lords FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-9700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
195 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
135 FPS
100%
Price, $
$336.78
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.72/FPS
100%
![Intel Core i7 i7-9700K Octa-core [8 Core] 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151 - OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B09238FZVP.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-9700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-9700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $385.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
