In Rust, the Core i3-4160T is slightly slower than the Core i7-8700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i7-8700
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 223 vs 215 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-8700: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
100%
Price, $
$148.62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-8700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-8700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700 Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
