In Rust, the Core i3-4160T is slightly slower than the Core i7-7820HQ. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-7820HQ
- Up to 3% faster in Rust – 221 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Rust
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-7820HQ: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-7820HQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-7820HQ in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-7820HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-7820HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $378.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
