In Rust, the Core i3-4160T is slightly faster than the Core i7-720QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Up to 3% faster in Rust – 214 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Jul 21, 2014 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-720QM
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-720QM: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-720QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-720QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-720QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
52%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-720QM Sep 23rd, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Sep 23rd, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $364.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGAG1 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | None |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
