In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4160T is slightly faster than the Core i7-6700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 185 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i7-6700
- Is 11 months and 10 days newer – Jul 01, 2015 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 11 months and 10 days newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-6700: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Average FPS
177 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
95%
Price, $
$122.39
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-6700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-6700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6700 Jul 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Jul 1st, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
