In Atomfall, the Core i3-4160T is slightly faster than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 197 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer – Jul 21, 2014 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer
Core i7-620M
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
