In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Core i3-4160T is slightly faster than the Core i7-4850HQ. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Up to 1% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 251 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer – Jul 21, 2014 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 35 vs 47 Watts
- Consumes up to 26% less energy
Core i7-4850HQ
No clear advantages
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-4850HQ: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-4850HQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-4850HQ in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4850HQ
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4850HQ Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
35W | Power Consumption | 47W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 5200 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
