In Atomfall, the Core i3-4160T is slightly slower than the Core i7-4712MQ. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Jul 21, 2014 vs Apr 14, 2013
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 5% less energy – 35 vs 37 Watts
- Consumes up to 5% less energy
Core i7-4712MQ
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 199 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-4712MQ: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-4712MQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-4712MQ in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4712MQ
Apr 14th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4712MQ Apr 14th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Apr 14th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | $378.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGAG3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 37 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
