In Deathloop, the Core i3-4160T is slightly slower than the Core i7-13700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i7-13700
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop – 237 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-13700: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
237 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
177 FPS
100%
Price, $
$369.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.56/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-13700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-13700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
