In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i3-4160T is slower than the Core i7-11700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i7-11700
- Up to 19% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 114 vs 96 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-11700: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-11700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-11700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-11700
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-11700 Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $323.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
