In Rust, the Core i3-4160T is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 10% faster in Rust – 236 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
236 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
