In Atomfall, the Core i3-4160T is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-9400
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 209 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-9400: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-9400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-9400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400 Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
